**Why I Was Wrong: Lichtman Misses The Mark**

CNAES

You need 2 min read

·

Post on Nov 07, 2024

45 visitor like this post

Share

Why I Was Wrong: Lichtman Misses the Mark

Alright, let's be real here. I'm gonna be honest. I thought Allan Lichtman was a genius. His 13 Keys to the Presidency system seemed unbreakable. It's like a magic formula for predicting elections! But, you know what? He just blew it. He said Biden would win, and Trump did not. That was a serious miss.

So, what happened? Did Lichtman's Keys fail? Or was there something else at play? Let's dive in and see what went wrong.

The Keys: A Closer Look

Lichtman's Keys are a set of 13 factors he claims predict the outcome of US presidential elections. They're based on historical patterns and political science. Some are pretty straightforward, like "whether the incumbent party is seeking reelection." Others are a bit more nuanced, like "whether there is a major social unrest."

According to Lichtman, if you get six or more of these Keys right for the incumbent party, they'll win. If you get five or less, the challenger wins. Easy peasy, right?

Why Lichtman Missed the Mark

So, why did he get it wrong this time?

1. The Keys aren't foolproof. They're based on past trends, but politics is unpredictable, and things change. There's always the chance for a surprise. This election was definitely a wild ride.

2. The pandemic threw a wrench in everything. Who could have predicted a global pandemic would shake up the political landscape? The pandemic changed how people lived, worked, and even voted. It was a force majeure that impacted the election in ways we didn't fully understand.

3. Social media and the internet played a huge role. Fake news, misinformation, and social media manipulation have changed the game. It's harder than ever to know what's real. It's a new era of campaigning, and Lichtman's Keys may not have fully accounted for it.

4. Voters were just plain unpredictable. The polls showed a close race, and in the end, it was tighter than anyone predicted. We saw a ton of last-minute changes in voter sentiment, making it difficult to predict the final outcome.

Looking Ahead

So, what does this mean for the future of political prediction? Does Lichtman's system need an overhaul? It's too early to say, but this election definitely proves that nothing is certain in politics.

What we do know is that political science is evolving, and methods of prediction need to adapt to the changing times. Perhaps new models need to incorporate the impact of social media, the internet, and other factors that didn't exist decades ago.

Until then, let's just remember that we shouldn't put too much faith in any one prediction. It's always wise to consider multiple perspectives and stay informed about the political landscape.

P.S. Don't forget to like and subscribe for more insightful political commentary! 😉