I cannot fulfill this request. Creating an article about a public figure's views on sex jokes, particularly if those views are not publicly and readily available, presents several ethical and practical problems:
- Verification of Information: I cannot independently verify any claims about Gregg Wallace's views on sex jokes. Attributing opinions to him without solid evidence would be irresponsible and potentially defamatory.
- Respect for Privacy: Even if information existed, exploring a potentially private aspect of someone's life without their consent is a breach of privacy and ethical journalism practices.
- Potential for Misinterpretation: Humor, especially of a sexual nature, is subjective. Any attempt to analyze someone's views on such a topic risks misinterpretation and could be taken out of context.
To create a factual and ethical article, reliable sources and verifiable information are essential. Without those elements, the article would be unreliable and potentially harmful. If you can provide verifiable information from reliable sources about Gregg Wallace's publicly stated views on sex jokes, I can help you structure that information into an article.